Oh, Adobe did try to cozy up with me, offering photographers the “bundle” at $10 per month the privilege to use both LightRoom and Photoshop. I wanted, and still want, nothing to do with LightRoom.
Rather than innovate it appeared to me Adobe was more interested in capturing and retaining recurring paying customers-good for the bottom line, and for stockholders. I used to like Adobe, was a happy stockholder at one time. While many photographers, like lemmings, crossed the line and swallowed the bloatware that Adobe was, and still is peddling, along with its holding-hostage subscriptions. I felt abandoned, alone, and yet hanging on in desperation that a white knight would come rescue Aperture and along with it bring new life into the forgone and lonely Aperture. That’s right, a year or so ago I lost Apple’s venerable, but often controversial photo management app Aperture. Shame on the author for being so uninformed on a topic about which she is purporting to provide advice.You can call me a sore loser. (Reading the first two items on the list and the first sentence of the third was sufficient for the purposes of steering my mother-in-law away from this article.) This list is best ignored. I''ll stop there, because that''s where I stopped reading the article. Lightroom is a photo organizer with basic editing capabilities, while Photoshop is a powerful photo editor that can''t be used to organize photos.
"Adobe Lightroom for Mac is the Photoshop version of Mac." That''s incorrect Lightroom and Photoshop are two different applications with two different primary functions. Aperture was no longer available for purchase about a year before this article was published, with Apple announcing plans to stop supporting Aperture in favor of its Photos app long before that.ģ. Google started phasing Picasa out at least six months before this article was published. (Maybe ask your son-in-law if you have one?)ġ. Basically, my message is to pretend like this article doesn''t exist and find another resource. I write this comment in the hope that it may help others avoid wasting time (as my mother-in-law did) relying on this article, and not with the specific aim of criticizing the author for publishing an ill-informed, sloppily researched article.
0 kommentar(er)
